Perfectionism rarely feels like perfection. On the surface, it can look like discipline, conscientiousness, or high standards. But internally, it often feels like a relentless vibration — the sense that you’re never quite done, never quite enough, never fully permitted to rest. Even achievements don’t settle; they evaporate almost instantly, replaced by the next thing you “should” be doing.

​

Self-criticism can become so constant it feels like the background noise of being alive. It may show up as the voice that reviews your missteps before they happen, the impulse to downplay accomplishments, or the quiet anxiety that comes after any moment of success. Perfectionism is not simply about wanting things to go well; it’s about fearing what might happen if they don’t.

​

Psychoanalysis has long been interested in this internal harshness. Freud described the superego as a kind of internal observer — part judge, part parent, part ghost of cultural expectations — that watches us, evaluates us, and sometimes punishes us from within. It’s formed out of our earliest relationships, our identifications, our environments, and the conditions under which we first learned what it meant to be acceptable. Freud also understood the superego as fundamentally reactive: it emerges in relation to the id’s instinctual life — its impulses, desires, and unruly vitality. In this model, the superego polices the very parts of us that feel the most alive. The superego begins as an internalization of the world outside us, but over time it can become something more rigid and punitive than any actual person ever was.

​

For many people, the superego doesn’t just critique behavior; it critiques the self. It speaks in absolutes: you should have known better, you should be better, everyone is going to be talking about this. It demands perfection to protect against shame or rejection, and it often does so with a kind of ferocity that far exceeds any real-world standard. Therapy isn’t about silencing this voice; it’s about understanding what it believes it’s protecting and what fears fuel its vigilance.

​

Perfectionism usually has roots in early environments where emotional stakes were attached to being good, impressive, quiet, accomplished, self-reliant, or invisible. Some people grew up anticipating others’ needs, keeping everything calm, or being the competent one when the adults weren’t. Others learned early on that mistakes came with consequences — criticism, withdrawal, unpredictability, disappointment, or simply too much attention. Perfectionism once served a purpose. It protected you. It kept the world manageable. It helped maintain connection. The problem is that these strategies don’t retire themselves once the danger is over.

​

And of course, it isn’t only the inner world shaping this pressure. Living and working in a place like New York City can intensify perfectionism until it feels indistinguishable from survival. Hustle culture rewards overextension. Professional environments normalize exhaustion. Creative and corporate fields alike demand constant visibility, constant output, constant reinvention. Even rest feels performative here, as if you should be optimizing your downtime. In this ecosystem, the superego doesn’t just react to early experiences — it recruits the culture around you as evidence that you must keep going, keep improving, keep proving.

​

The self-criticism that once kept things safe can become a cage. You may find yourself unable to receive praise, uncertain whether your accomplishments “count,” or suspicious of your own rest. You may seek feedback constantly but struggle to believe it. You may feel competent but not confident, capable but not grounded. The superego keeps scanning for the next flaw, the next risk, the next imperfection, as if vigilance could outrun vulnerability.

​

In therapy, we slow down enough to notice what this vigilance is guarding. Freud understood the superego as born in relation to the id—those instinctual, unruly parts of the self that want. Perfectionism often involves an unconscious war against these instinctual impulses, as though the liveliest parts of the self must be controlled or minimized to remain acceptable. When the superego becomes overgrown, the id doesn’t disappear; it retreats, gets distorted, or leaks out in exhaustion, irritability, procrastination, or longing.

​

Part of the work is helping these forces come back into conversation with one another—so the critic doesn’t dominate, and the instinctual self isn’t exiled. As the internal hierarchy loosens, something more human begins to emerge: a self that can want without apology, rest without guilt, create without perfection, and relate without bracing for judgment.

​

This isn’t about dismantling your standards or becoming less ambitious. It’s about creating a life where ambition isn’t fueled by fear, where excellence isn’t confused with self-erasure, and where the part of you that feels most alive has room to breathe.

​

Over time, perfectionism loses its totalizing hold. You begin to feel the difference between striving and self-punishment, between discernment and self-surveillance. The internal critic softens into perspective rather than punishment. And the instincts that once felt dangerous—desire, rest, pleasure, curiosity—start to feel like sources of vitality rather than threats to control.

​